Example
Your building
ICI Score
79 / 100
Good
Evidence coverage
65%
4 of 5 major systems documented
Moderate evidence. 2 of 3 scored systems have a recent professional observation; the rest are estimated from age.
Method 2.4, pre-ratification · as of 2026 · Evidence coverage describes the record, not the building, and never changes the score. How the ICI Score works
Systems the visitor identified
Reported by the visitor. ICI has not received or verified it.
-
Roof
Supporting record reported
- Age: 10 of 25 typical years
- Professional observation 2024: no concerns
91ExcellentProfessional observation and age -
Heating
Supporting record reported
- Age: 15 of 18 typical years
- Professional observation 2025: minor concerns
72GoodProfessional observation and age -
Hot water
Best-known answer
- Age: 7 of 10 typical years (estimated from age; no observation)
74GoodEstimated from age -
Cooling
Unknown
- No install year or professional observation is recorded.
Not known -
Electrical panel
Unknown
- No professional observation is recorded, and the electrical panel has no governed service life.
Not known
Important missing information
Missing documentation is not evidence of poor physical condition. It describes the record, not the building.
Cooling
No install year or professional observation is recorded.
Electrical panel
No professional observation is recorded, and the electrical panel has no governed service life.
Evidence that would strengthen this result
- Cooling: install or replacement year
- Cooling: a supporting record such as an invoice, permit or service record
- Cooling: a professional inspection or service within 5 years
- Hot water: a supporting record such as an invoice, permit or service record
- Hot water: a professional inspection or service within 5 years
- Electrical panel: a supporting record such as an invoice, permit or service record
- Electrical panel: a professional inspection or service within 5 years
Practical next actions
Suggestions, not instructions. None of them changes this profile.
Improves the record
Locate the installation invoice for the cooling system. Missing documentation is not evidence of poor physical condition, and recording it may strengthen the evidence available for a future assessment.
Improves the record
Confirm the model and serial number on the furnace rating plate. It is usually on a label inside the front panel.
Consults an official source
Check the manufacturer or an official recall authority for notices affecting this equipment. Overlap with a notice is not confirmation that a unit is affected.
Obtains professional verification
Ask a qualified professional to confirm the electrical panel rating and condition. Follow their instructions and any manufacturer instructions over general guidance.
Supports a future reassessment
After updated evidence is recorded, a new dated Condition Profile may reflect it.
Supporting evidence, local context
and limitations
Evidence coverage
Evidence coverage 65%: 4 of 5 major systems documented. 2 of 3 scored systems have a recent professional observation; the rest are estimated from age.
Counted in the resultHeatingHot waterRoof
Regional conditions describe the area, not this building. They create things worth checking. They never change the Condition Profile above.
Local conditions and what they touch
Representative Calgary example. Regional context suggests what may deserve review; it never establishes that a particular building was affected.
Freeze and thaw cycling
Touches drainage paths, sealed joints and exterior finishes.
Heavy rainfall
Touches roof drainage, grading and any below-grade protection.
Snow load
Touches safe equipment access more than structure on a house of this kind.
Wind exposure
Touches roof covering and cladding fixings.
Extreme heat
Touches cooling capacity, filters and electrical headroom.
What this suggests recording: installation dates, service visits and any repair after an event. When professional advice may help: before work involving fuel-fired equipment, electrical capacity or roof access.
These local conditions provide context only and do not change your Condition Profile result.
Sources, limitations and methodology
- This is not an inspection and not an engineering opinion.
- It is not an energy rating and reports no energy or emissions figure.
- It does not predict that anything will fail.
- It is not a valuation.
- It reports what the supplied records support, and says so where they support nothing.
This example uses invented information for illustration. No real building, owner or equipment is described.